Did the EU Ban Memes? Explanation of Article 13

what is article 13 reddit

But due to the edits to the final Copyright Directive, such worries subsided and no mass monitoring needed to be implemented. People worried that silly images with funny captions, like the one of the Nickelodeon cartoon character Spongebob Squarepants, pictured below, would be taken down by every platform. It was introduced to the public in the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market https://www.investorynews.com/ (Copyright Directive), a comprehensive copyright and licensing directive that sets overarching standards for the European Union (EU). She said it would be “likely to result in an ongoing lack of legal and commercial certainty” until legal cases set a precedent and “flesh out” the directive. YouTube had warned that the European Parliament’s original draft was its worst-case scenario.

The public responses to the potential meme ban and other provisions of the Copyright Directive draft were far more negative than the reactions to the two data protection laws. YouTube already has its Content ID system, which can detect copyright-protected music and videos and block them. But critics say developing and implementing this type of filter would be too expensive for small companies or start-ups. Critics say it would be impossible to pre-emptively license material in case users upload it. In a second blog post on November 12 she said there were “unintended consequences” of Article 13.

what is article 13 reddit

The internet is all aflutter today over the vote on ‘Article 13’ by the EU parliament. The future of the Internet is still wholly unknown — but at least for now, we can still share hilarious memes. But technology is adapting rapidly, and Europe has already passed other regulations that impact the digital space. The Copyright Directive officially took effect on June 7, 2019, and the Member States had until June 7, 2021, to establish laws supporting the directive. Along with this petition, potentially impacted services like YouTube have adopted campaigns using the hashtag #SaveYourInternet.

But as with the articles above, all of this depends on how the directive is interpreted by member states when they make it into national law. The Directive on Copyright would make online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringements, and supposedly direct more revenue from tech giants towards artists and journalists. And while the destruction of meme culture might be of an annoyance than a disaster there are wider implications. For example, new music tracks remixing and sampling other artists could find themselves blocked.

Did the EU Ban Memes? Explanation of Article 13

Article 13 no longer exists — in its current form as Article 17, it’s much less contentious and makes exceptions for users to post content like memes, parodies, criticisms, and reviews. The screenshot below shows a tweet from the https://www.forex-world.net/ user-dependent media platform of a “mockup” of what might’ve happened to YouTube if draft Article 13 passed. No, Article 13, which became Article 17 in the final version of the directive, did not end up banning internet memes.

“The parliament’s approach is unrealistic in many cases because copyright owners often disagree over who owns what rights,” she wrote. “If the owners cannot agree, it is impossible to expect the open platforms that host this content to make the correct rights decisions.” Boiled down, all this article is saying is that any websites that host large amounts of user-generated content (think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) are responsible for taking down that content if it infringes on copyright. Proponents of the Directive on Copyright argue that this means that people are listening to, watching and reading copyrighted material without the creators being properly paid for it. On April 15, 2019, the European Council – the political body composed of government ministers from each of the 28 EU member states – voted to adopt into EU law the copyright directive as passed by the European Parliament in March.

  1. Article 13 says content-sharing services must license copyright-protected material from the rights holders.
  2. There are fears it could outlaw news aggregators as we know them or even prevent any sites other than giants like Google, which could afford a license, from linking to articles at all.
  3. YouTube had warned that the European Parliament’s original draft was its worst-case scenario.
  4. A popup on the YouTube website and app directs users to a page with the title “#saveyourinternet” which includes a video from YouTube explaining the firm’s objections to the directive.

The EU’s proposed European Copyright Directive is being called a war on memes. The concern is that because Article 13 mandates the use of artificial intelligence and filtering technologies, those technologies are not advanced enough to pick up the nuances in content like memes. To a computer, all of the images probably look reasonably similar, therefore it might just block all of them.

When Did the Copyright Directive Take Effect?

The EU Copyright Directive — or to give its full name, the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market — is Europe’s attempt to harmonize copyright laws across all member states. GDPR has forced internet companies to scramble to fall in line with the new policy, but the privacy protections it promises internet users mean it’s generally thought of as a consumer-friendly effort. Some hail it as evidence that the EU is leading the way when it comes to regulating the internet. Companies including Google, along with free speech advocates and prominent figures within the EU, have opposed parts of the draft legislation.

The contentious nature of the legislation saw it morph through multiple iterations before the different EU institutions agreed on a version after three days of talks in France. The EU parliament voted 15 to 10 not to remove Article 13 from the proposal. Therefore, the next chance to stop the legislation from passing will be a plenary vote on 4-5 July. Thus citizens of Europe who are against Article 13 are advised to get in touch with their MEPs before this vote. While those are the negatives, there’s every chance that internet users might not notice these changes at all. In addition, some argue that the proposal gives no indication about which internet platforms would need to introduce these new filters.

what is article 13 reddit

Six member states (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against adopting the directive while three (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained from the vote. Now that the EU has agreed on a final text for the directive, the European Parliament will vote on the legislation. If it passes, it’ll come into force in each EU country over the next two years. “Article 13 takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users,” they said. Alex Voss, rapporteur of the European Parliament for the copyright directive, for one. He suggested the law and believes its criticisms are highly exaggerated.

Article 13 and internet culture:

They could only do that by directly monitoring all content uploaded to their sites. Some view this as censorship and say it stifles internet freedom of speech. Currently, most video game publishers let gamers share videos of their gameplay online. Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive states services such as YouTube could be held responsible if their users upload copyright-protected movies and music. Currently, platforms such as YouTube aren’t responsible for copyright violations, although they must remove that content when directed to do so by the rights holders. The first, mentioned in the open letter from internet heavyweights say the move would put unfair costs on smaller internet platforms.

How will this affect Facebook and other social media companies?

Article 13 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market implied a potential ban on memes — and people had a lot to say about it. It warned its Content ID system only worked if rights-holders engaged with it and “provided clarity” about what material belonged to them. It said it would be “too risky” to let anybody in the EU upload anything at all. It dramatically claimed it would have to block existing videos and new uploads from creators in the EU, and encouraged prominent vloggers to make videos about Article 13. Article 13 says it shall “in no way affect legitimate uses” and people will be allowed to use bits of copyright-protected material for the purpose of criticism, review, parody and pastiche.

The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market is a European Union directive that is designed to limit how copyrighted content is shared on online platforms. EU directives are a form of legislation that set an objective for member states to achieve. Article 13 is the part of the https://www.dowjonesanalysis.com/ directive that dictates how copyrighted content — including TV shows, films, videos and pictures — is shared on the internet. It dictates that anyone sharing copyrighted content must get permission from rights owners, or at least have made the best possible effort to get permission, before doing so.

The final version of a controversial new EU copyright law has been agreed after three days of talks in France. How much of an article has to be shared before a platform has to pay the publisher? It’d also prevent social platforms from showing any kind of “snippet” of news stories, making it ultimately harder to share and link to content. The last EU-wide copyright law was put in place in 2001, when the internet was a dramatically different place to how it is today.

In short, Article 13 would force sites and online platforms to use automatic tracking technology to detect when users uploaded content to make sure they weren’t sharing copyrighted material. The Directive on Copyright and its most controversial component, Article 13, requires online platforms to filter or remove copyrighted material from their websites. It’s this article that people think could be interpreted as requiring platforms to ban memes, but more on that later. Although the #saveyourinternet campaign has focused on stirring up opposition to the directive among YouTubers and users, the highest echelons of YouTube management have also got in on the opposition. On October 22, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki published a blogpost warning against the impact of the Directive.

Leave a Reply